What is criteria when picking top coach in poll vote for each candidate?

Is cup performance factored in also when some managers reviewing options?

James at Raith makes decent discussion points.

It's a balance though with incentives- I was asked to step in as a one-off replacement for a front page divisional review, but I felt the workload of reviewing 16 matches was not worth the 100k.

There doesn't seem a queue of volunteers willing to write match reviews and keep the front web page "fresh".

43 or 44 managers out of 48 didn't think it worth 100k bonus per week to andwer the request for vunteers a few times during this seaaon.  Economics dictates the price needs be of sufficient incentive.   Currently the vast majority do not wish write divisional reviews - for a variety.of reasons.  Could be time constraints or disconnection with set up at times.  But lowering the participation bonus would see even less likely of new.volunteers coming forward.

RR had a decent season I think, after a tricky start.  I don't want navigate away as I type incase I lose this text to my browser refreshing, but I noticed from memory a win then lose strategy by RR that is a decent plan. Sometimes 4.or 6 points from 9. 

Plenty for James at RR to shout about this season.  If he had the inclination ofcourse. 

😁