| Les Lithgo (HAM) | Change it: maybe max 20 or 1CP to increase | Seems effect of OTF not important to most teams. |
| Matt Cooper (ALB) | Change it: maybe max 20 or 1CP to increase | 32 teams have less than half OTF max. Time to review it. |
| Bill Ramsay (RAN) | Change it: maybe max 20 or 1CP to increase | |
| Ricky Hawthorn (STE) | Change it: maybe max 20 or 1CP to increase | |
| Dave Smyth (HEA) | Yes, most teams now ignore OTF. | I think very fewi people understand it. To use 6 CP each season is huge for something you dont understand - I'm one of them |
| David Campbell (KIL) | Yes, most teams now ignore OTF. | |
| Derek Purvis (BER) | Yes, most teams now ignore OTF. | |
| Daniel Roseblade (DFA) | Change it: maybe max 20 or 1CP to increase | |
| Mark Boland (DUU) | Change it: maybe max 20 or 1CP to increase | CP is usually in short supply so the cost seems prohibitive. |
| Lee Elkins (CB) | No, leave OTF as it is, no change. | I'd say leave it - but if it were to change I'd say 1 CP per OTD slot, and max 15-20. It shouldnt be a big factor in the game, but a tweak... |
| Paul Cockayne (EF) | Change it: maybe max 20 or 1CP to increase | Never been convinced OTF is effective. Assuming it is then I vote for a cheaper price and a higher max. |
| Marc Legowski (PT) | No, leave OTF as it is, no change. | Last season with the roll back most teams came short in funds. That could be the reason that no CP has gone to increasing OTF. |
| Willy Krosnyak (FOR) | Yes, most teams now ignore OTF. | I am not quite sure about OTF and have not fully grasped it yet, so would need to investigate further but ut does seem costly |
| Arnold Yzermans (QOS) | Change it: maybe max 20 or 1CP to increase | I'd go max 12, 1CP increase, or perhaps 75k increase. 2CP is too expensive for a small but important benefit. |
| Raymond Cini (CLY) | No, leave OTF as it is, no change. | The fact that fewer teams use it makes it that much more valuable to those that do... |
| David Blair (HIB) | No, leave OTF as it is, no change. | |
| Steve Turner (ALO) | Yes, most teams now ignore OTF. | I am sure that if i fully understood it i may use it. Maybe worthwhile looking that instead on TP/CP for MVP Bonus OTF if used instead. |
| James Tucker (RR) | No, leave OTF as it is, no change. | If it has lost value through SL inflation increase the multipliers during match resolution. If you make it 20CP that is equivalent to doubling the mutliplier. |
| Colin Scott (DUM) | Yes, most teams now ignore OTF. | ...but don't tell them how good it is. I need all the help I can get, so let's just drop the subject thanks. |
| Tapani Olkku (GM) | Other idea: add comment..... | Does my bum look big in this? |
| Andrew Foss-Grant (MOT) | No, leave OTF as it is, no change. | Some teams ignore it (like MOT) but that is our choice. We want diversity not uniformity |
| Eduard Habermann (DEE) | Yes, most teams now ignore OTF. | |
| Steve Gregory (COV) | Yes, most teams now ignore OTF. | |
| John McCarthy (LIV) | Yes, most teams now ignore OTF. | |
| Matthew White (SM) | Change it: maybe max 20 or 1CP to increase | |
| Josh Fitzgerald (INV) | Yes, most teams now ignore OTF. | |
| Andrew McCumiskey (SRA) | Change it: maybe max 20 or 1CP to increase | |
| Rob Lye (ROS) | Change it: maybe max 20 or 1CP to increase | |
| James White (MON) | Yes, most teams now ignore OTF. | |
| Cameron Archibald (ARB) | Yes, most teams now ignore OTF. | |
| Bill Nicholl (CEL) | Yes, most teams now ignore OTF. | |
| Paul Roseblade (AYR) | Change it: maybe max 20 or 1CP to increase | |