Free online football manager game. Established 1998
RULES 2025: click here for Scottish Electronic Soccer League: 2025 wiki rules courtesy of Andrew SRA
Reminder: trade window closes 28 March 2025
RULES 2025: click here for Scottish Electronic Soccer League: 2025 wiki rules courtesy of Andrew SRA
Reminder: trade window closes 28 March 2025
The Trade Window is currently closed but will open again on Thursday, May 15th at 12:00 GMT...
Poll Results: Should Cecil Cup be changed to a group phase to help spread gate receipt income amongst more teams?
VOTING SUMMARY
| CHOICE | TOTAL VOTES |
| No change | 16 |
| 8 groups of 6, then quarters, semi, final | 9 |
| other comment | 5 |
| 6 groups of 8, then quarters, semi, final | 2 |
VOTING BREAKDOWN
| MANAGER | CHOICE | COMMENTS | |
 | Andrew McCumiskey (SRA) | No change | It would make both cups similar.....embrace the difference |
 | James Tucker (RR) | other comment | Big groups mean dead rubbers and weak teams How about a shield competition. for first round losers. |
 | Matt Cooper (ALB) | No change | No change basically would be same format as SESL |
 | David Blair (HIB) | No change | The wee clubs get to tilt at the big lads - that is life in EVERY league..🤔 |
 | Dave Smyth (HEA) | 8 groups of 6, then quarters, semi, final | Try for a season to spread the wealth. 10 group matches to TP up age 0 for lower teams. |
 | Bryce Kalmbach (QP) | No change | I like the difference in format between competitions. |
 | Daniel Fitzgerald (ANN) | No change | |
 | Ricky Hawthorn (STE) | No change | |
 | William Bushby (EDI) | No change | |
 | Bill Ramsay (RAN) | other comment | If the objective is to spread the gate money around more, then fine, give it a go but see my Blog dated 27th July. The 6 groups of 8 produces more gate money for each club but the 8 groups of 6 reduce naturally (top 2 progress) to a 16 knockout format. |
 | Tyron Barnard (EST) | other comment | IF we gonna do group stages Id prefer something completely different from SESL Cup and maybe have grps of 3 |
 | Alan Bishop (COW) | No change | |
 | Willy Krosnyak (FOR) | 8 groups of 6, then quarters, semi, final | One round in neutral field. |
 | Colin Scott (DUM) | No change | |
 | Jason Dowson (ELG) | No change | Like the straight cup format |
 | Andrew Foss-Grant (MOT) | other comment | I do agree that the money helps keep the best teams at the top and the smaller teams out. I don't know how to fix that |
 | Andy Shaw (FAL) | other comment | Another cup competition for the 32 teams that don’t make the third round. |
 | Richard Burnett (NAI) | 8 groups of 6, then quarters, semi, final | happy with either idea for the groups |
 | Derek Purvis (BER) | 8 groups of 6, then quarters, semi, final | |
 | Steve Gregory (COV) | 8 groups of 6, then quarters, semi, final | |
 | Josh Fitzgerald (INV) | No change | |
 | Steve Turner (ALO) | No change | |
 | Rob Lye (ROS) | No change | |
 | Stephen Williams (PET) | 8 groups of 6, then quarters, semi, final | |
 | Matthew White (SM) | 8 groups of 6, then quarters, semi, final | |
 | Marc Legowski (CLY) | 6 groups of 8, then quarters, semi, final | |
 | Cameron Archibald (ARB) | No change | I like having different formats for the Cups. |
 | Alon Atie (FRA) | 8 groups of 6, then quarters, semi, final | 6 groups would be harder to work out quaterfinalists |
 | David Campbell (KIL) | No change | Nah, it's worked fine for many years. |
 | Raymond Cini (PT) | 8 groups of 6, then quarters, semi, final | |
 | Eduard Habermann (DEE) | 6 groups of 8, then quarters, semi, final | |
 | Mark Creasey (STJ) | No change | |