 | Mark Boland (DUU) | other (please specify) | Aggression in SOS needs an overhaul. Needs to be less impact, stronger punishment or cap on amount of aggressive players per match. |
 | Matthew White (SM) | Scrap it - daft rule. | |
 | Mark Creasey (STJ) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | Someone has to keep an eye on it to make sure that 200 is the right number. |
 | Tyron Barnard (EST) | Allow an appeal for fine. | Or alternatively build in a scale. 100-149 is 50k fine, 150-199 is 100k fine and 200+ is a 200k+ fine |
 | Andy Shaw (FAL) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
 | Kevin Hull (AI) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | I have no idea how this should be. I have no objection about the rule though. The rule must have been put in place to prevent everyone from playing all games a/d. If that was necessary, then there must have been a need for it. I say lets keep it. |
 | Josh Fitzgerald (INV) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
 | Rob Lye (ROS) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
 | Lee Elkins (CB) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | Not a big deal! |
 | Ricky Hawthorn (STE) | Scrap it - daft rule. | |
 | David Blair (HIB) | Allow an appeal for fine. | There have been clear times were teams haven't been overly aggressive yet random cards and sending offs throw them through the limit |
 | Andrew Foss-Grant (MOT) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | I was against it when first introduced but now I think it serves its purpose! |
 | William Bushby (EDI) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
 | Bill Ramsay (RAN) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
 | Roy Rolsten (STI) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
 | Simon Bijker (BRE) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | Does its job ok |
 | Daniel Roseblade (DFA) | Scrap it - daft rule. | Teams playing A and D get hit by lower ELs and suspensions - that's enough. If players don't want to use legal tactics that is up to them but don't further penalise players who do!! |
 | Tapani Olkku (GM) | Scrap it - daft rule. | |
 | Matt Cooper (ALB) | Scrap it - daft rule. | Well was i bound to say anything else! Still think Dp's should be league based though! |
 | James White (MON) | Allow an appeal for fine. | |
 | Daniel Fitzgerald (ANN) | Allow an appeal for fine. | |
 | Andrew McCumiskey (SRA) | other (please specify) | Should be proportional to games played and include playoffs etc |
 | Richard Burnett (NAI) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
 | Steve Turner (ALO) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
 | Cameron Archibald (ARB) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | I'm in the minority (I imagine ... Find out in a second) that thinks the DP rule is ok. |
 | Raymond Cini (PT) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
 | John McCarthy (LIV) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
 | Colin Scott (DUM) | Scrap it - daft rule. | Can we put me down for the same vote at end of every season...? |
 | Paul Roseblade (AYR) | other (please specify) | Raise it to 300 DP. Teams already have to deal with suspensions through the season |
 | Stephen Williams (PET) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
 | Willy Krosnyak (FOR) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
 | Dave Smyth (HEA) | other (please specify) | Base it ave per game, that way teams who have good cup runs don't suffer |
 | James Tucker (RR) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | If it remains so effective then some deterrent is needed. If not then we could scrap this rule. |
 | Bill Nicholl (CEL) | Scrap it - daft rule. | Not a fan of this rule, even we got caught out by this a few seasons back, still don't know how!!! |
 | Derek Purvis (BER) | Scrap it - daft rule. | |
 | Steve Gregory (COV) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | Need some limits for Fair Play |
 | Alon Atie (FRA) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
 | Marc Legowski (CLY) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |