| Mark Boland (DUU) | other (please specify) | Aggression in SOS needs an overhaul. Needs to be less impact, stronger punishment or cap on amount of aggressive players per match. |
| Matthew White (SM) | Scrap it - daft rule. | |
| Mark Creasey (STJ) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | Someone has to keep an eye on it to make sure that 200 is the right number. |
| Tyron Barnard (EST) | Allow an appeal for fine. | Or alternatively build in a scale. 100-149 is 50k fine, 150-199 is 100k fine and 200+ is a 200k+ fine |
| Andy Shaw (FAL) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
| Kevin Hull (AI) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | I have no idea how this should be. I have no objection about the rule though. The rule must have been put in place to prevent everyone from playing all games a/d. If that was necessary, then there must have been a need for it. I say lets keep it. |
| Josh Fitzgerald (INV) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
| Rob Lye (ROS) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
| Lee Elkins (CB) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | Not a big deal! |
| Ricky Hawthorn (STE) | Scrap it - daft rule. | |
| David Blair (HIB) | Allow an appeal for fine. | There have been clear times were teams haven't been overly aggressive yet random cards and sending offs throw them through the limit |
| Andrew Foss-Grant (MOT) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | I was against it when first introduced but now I think it serves its purpose! |
| William Bushby (EDI) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
| Bill Ramsay (RAN) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
| Roy Rolsten (STI) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
| Fran Morillo (BRE) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | Does its job ok |
| Daniel Roseblade (DFA) | Scrap it - daft rule. | Teams playing A and D get hit by lower ELs and suspensions - that's enough. If players don't want to use legal tactics that is up to them but don't further penalise players who do!! |
| Tapani Olkku (GM) | Scrap it - daft rule. | |
| Matt Cooper (ALB) | Scrap it - daft rule. | Well was i bound to say anything else! Still think Dp's should be league based though! |
| James White (MON) | Allow an appeal for fine. | |
| Daniel Fitzgerald (ANN) | Allow an appeal for fine. | |
| Andrew McCumiskey (SRA) | other (please specify) | Should be proportional to games played and include playoffs etc |
| Richard Burnett (NAI) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
| Steve Turner (ALO) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
| Cameron Archibald (ARB) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | I'm in the minority (I imagine ... Find out in a second) that thinks the DP rule is ok. |
| Marc Legowski (PT) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
| John McCarthy (LIV) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
| Colin Scott (DUM) | Scrap it - daft rule. | Can we put me down for the same vote at end of every season...? |
| Paul Roseblade (AYR) | other (please specify) | Raise it to 300 DP. Teams already have to deal with suspensions through the season |
| Stephen Williams (PET) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
| Willy Krosnyak (FOR) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
| Dave Smyth (HEA) | other (please specify) | Base it ave per game, that way teams who have good cup runs don't suffer |
| James Tucker (RR) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | If it remains so effective then some deterrent is needed. If not then we could scrap this rule. |
| Bill Nicholl (CEL) | Scrap it - daft rule. | Not a fan of this rule, even we got caught out by this a few seasons back, still don't know how!!! |
| Derek Purvis (BER) | Scrap it - daft rule. | |
| Steve Gregory (COV) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | Need some limits for Fair Play |
| Alon Atie (FRA) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |
| Raymond Cini (CLY) | No change - keep it at 200DP+ | |