| Dave Smyth (HEA) | Other (please specify) | Managers want instant power players and don't want to waist time building youth |
| William Bushby (EDI) | Apprentices too expensive | |
| Lee Elkins (CB) | Other (please specify) | Why should it be higher? |
| Andrew Foss-Grant (MOT) | Other (please specify) | TP should always be less expensive than CP when the teams get 40 FREE each season. Im not saying that its a problem, that's just the way it is! |
| Marc Legowski (PT) | Other (please specify) | The large amount of apprentices with high SL means less value in TP.
Also a lot of teams just don't want to train up age 0 players |
| Daniel Fitzgerald (ANN) | CP that can be used on more players | |
| James Tucker (RR) | Too much TP given at season start | But it the price will creep up - it always does |
| Bryce Kalmbach (QP) | CP that can be used on more players | |
| Paul Cockayne (EF) | Apprentices too expensive | Cheaper apprentices (250k, 150k 100k) might encourage TPs to be used on them. |
| Steve Gregory (COV) | Too much TP given at season start | |
| Josh Fitzgerald (INV) | Other (please specify) | I have many thoughts on this TP/CP/SL issue but will keep them to myself this once. Interested in Other opinions. |
| Daniel Roseblade (DFA) | Other (please specify) | I think that CP was Very bit valued, for me CP and TP must have a value similar... 80K both. |
| Matthew White (SM) | Too much TP given at season start | Didn't it used to be just thirty some time back? |
| Ricky Hawthorn (STE) | Other (please specify) | Apprentices not too expensive, but seen as to much of a risk due to low sl. Apprentices should perhaps start as sl7?? |
| Andy Shaw (FAL) | CP that can be used on more players | no real issue though |
| Raymond Cini (CLY) | CP that can be used on more players | This will not be a popular comment, I am sure. :-) There are too many high SL players in the game, which by definition are commonly age 2+. Teams dedicate resources to CP to keep older SL's elevated. |
| Steve Turner (ALO) | Too much TP given at season start | Some teams are not interested in using TP's and use them to trade to others. Therefore no requirement to bid high for TP's as there are a lot available in trades. |
| Willy Krosnyak (FOR) | Other (please specify) | Not higher? |
| Colin Scott (DUM) | Other (please specify) | Apps can be too costly. Not too much TP, but only enough room for 50 max, so less room to buy more. Not enough time to spend it. Not enough apps in the team. I think I might run out of spac |
| Kevin Hull (AI) | Too much TP given at season start | |
| Matt Cooper (ALB) | Apprentices too expensive | |
| Paul Roseblade (AYR) | Other (please specify) | Can't comment - don't play in any other leagues so can't say! |
| Tapani Olkku (GM) | Other (please specify) | |
| Arnold Yzermans (QOS) | Other (please specify) | because you get an even number of TP at season start not a lot of demand unless you are trying to build up a 5th player |
| Roy Rolsten (STI) | Other (please specify) | This league is very competative. we all look for the higher skilled players. so TP is often used for trades which decreases its value. I guess? |
| Bill Ramsay (RAN) | Other (please specify) | TP isn't cheap its just that CP is scarce and that pushes the price up above TP |
| James White (MON) | CP that can be used on more players | |
| David Campbell (KIL) | Too much TP given at season start | |
| Cameron Archibald (ARB) | Other (please specify) | I don't know, just interested in seeing the opinions. |
| Ross Hayworth (ABE) | Apprentices too expensive | |