Free online football manager game. Established 1998
RULES 2024: click here for Scottish Electronic Soccer League: Season 56 wiki rules courtesy of Andrew SRA
RULES 2024: click here for Scottish Electronic Soccer League: Season 56 wiki rules courtesy of Andrew SRA
Next Auction Deadline in 11 hours and 30 minutes...
The Trade Window is currently open...
Poll Results: Old playes being cashed in for money to buy apprentices?
VOTING SUMMARY
| CHOICE | TOTAL VOTES |
| All ok, and no change needed | 23 |
| Cash-in values should be higher | 7 |
| Cash-in values should be lower | 2 |
| other comment | 1 |
VOTING BREAKDOWN
| MANAGER | CHOICE | COMMENTS | |
 | Andrew Foss-Grant (MOT) | other comment | I'm too new, and will defer to the others on value. I do like the rule, I just hope it's not too much manual work for the commish! |
 | Fran Morillo (BRE) | All ok, and no change needed | |
 | Cameron Archibald (ARB) | All ok, and no change needed | I can't really have another view as not been back long enough to form one. Seems decent enough to me. I have a few players who are close to worthless so if they can help fund a youngster then happy days :) |
 | Steve Turner (ALO) | All ok, and no change needed | |
 | Andy Shaw (FAL) | All ok, and no change needed | |
 | Andrew McCumiskey (SRA) | All ok, and no change needed | |
 | James Tucker (RR) | All ok, and no change needed | Seems to work well. Maybe a little less for Age 4's. I do also wonder if the rewards should be highest for older players, but these are minor. |
 | Rob Lye (ROS) | Cash-in values should be higher | Slightly higher. Otherwise, the system works. Can this be made another type of standard 'transaction' so it doesn't require manual effort by the overworked GM? |
 | Matt Cooper (ALB) | All ok, and no change needed | |
 | Josh Fitzgerald (INV) | All ok, and no change needed | |
 | Willy Krosnyak (FOR) | All ok, and no change needed | The added limits make it make more sense (I retired a high SL the first time around for too much K) |
 | Tyron Barnard (EST) | Cash-in values should be lower | |
 | Daniel Fitzgerald (ANN) | All ok, and no change needed | |
 | Mark Boland (DUU) | All ok, and no change needed | |
 | Paul Roseblade (AYR) | All ok, and no change needed | |
 | Ricky Hawthorn (STE) | All ok, and no change needed | |
 | Bryce Kalmbach (QP) | All ok, and no change needed | |
 | Leon Permentier (DEV) | All ok, and no change needed | |
 | Dave Smyth (HEA) | All ok, and no change needed | Seems a good benefit for lower division teams where apprentices cheaper |
 | Eduard Habermann (DEE) | Cash-in values should be higher | The prices for new players are high while you also need to invest in them. |
 | Steve Gregory (COV) | All ok, and no change needed | |
 | Ross Hayworth (ABE) | Cash-in values should be higher | |
 | Paul Cockayne (EF) | All ok, and no change needed | But could clubs cash in their old beggars without an apprentice for say 60% of the total earned? |
 | Stephen Williams (PET) | All ok, and no change needed | |
 | Bill Ramsay (RAN) | All ok, and no change needed | |
 | Bill Nicholl (CEL) | Cash-in values should be higher | All OK really if 28 teams took part in March |
 | Alon Atie (FRA) | All ok, and no change needed | |
 | Les Lithgo (HAM) | Cash-in values should be higher | Popular as it is mind you |
 | David Campbell (KIL) | All ok, and no change needed | |
 | Raymond Cini (CLY) | All ok, and no change needed | |
 | John McCarthy (LIV) | Cash-in values should be lower | |
 | Colin Scott (DUM) | Cash-in values should be higher | |
 | Richard Burnett (NAI) | Cash-in values should be higher | |