Free online football manager game. Established 1998
RULES 2024: click here for Scottish Electronic Soccer League: Season 56 wiki rules courtesy of Andrew SRA
RULES 2024: click here for Scottish Electronic Soccer League: Season 56 wiki rules courtesy of Andrew SRA
Next Auction Deadline in 11 hours and 43 minutes...
The Trade Window is currently open...
Poll Results: Signing apprentice age 0 players are priced well in SESL?
VOTING SUMMARY
| CHOICE | TOTAL VOTES |
| Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | 23 |
| No, should be same price for all teams. | 3 |
| Mibbees aye, mibbees no | 3 |
VOTING BREAKDOWN
| MANAGER | CHOICE | COMMENTS | |
 | Colin Scott (DUM) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | |
 | Daniel Fitzgerald (ANN) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | |
 | Bill Ramsay (RAN) | No, should be same price for all teams. | |
 | Andrew Foss-Grant (MOT) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | again it aint broke so why fiddle with it? |
 | Dave Smyth (HEA) | No, should be same price for all teams. | |
 | Rob Lye (ROS) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | |
 | Arnold Yzermans (QOS) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | Makes it more imperative to get auction players when you're higher up the ladder. I like it |
 | Mark Creasey (STJ) | No, should be same price for all teams. | |
 | Ricky Hawthorn (STE) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | |
 | Josh Fitzgerald (INV) | Mibbees aye, mibbees no | High price for division 1 apprentice makes managers use auction more upping cost of super-apprentices. Downside is that it makes it harder for lower division teams to pick up/justify paying for these super players. |
 | Ross Hayworth (ABE) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | keep status quo (rocking all over) |
 | Cameron Archibald (ARB) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | Seems fine the way it is. Certainly think a difference between divisions is good. |
 | Matt Cooper (ALB) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | |
 | Andrew McCumiskey (SRA) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | |
 | David Blair (HIB) | Mibbees aye, mibbees no | |
 | James Tucker (RR) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | |
 | Paul Roseblade (AYR) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | |
 | Steve Turner (ALO) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | |
 | Steve Gregory (COV) | Mibbees aye, mibbees no | |
 | Willy Krosnyak (FOR) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | Lower divisions should pay less, they also receive less income. |
 | Andy Shaw (FAL) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | |
 | Derek Purvis (BER) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | |
 | Daniel Roseblade (DFA) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | helps lower Divs re-build |
 | Matthew White (SM) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | |
 | Tyron Barnard (EST) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | |
 | Raymond Cini (CLY) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | Up in the air on this, but I see no reason to change. |
 | James White (MON) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | |
 | William Bushby (EDI) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | |
 | Stephen Williams (PET) | Yes, 200k-400k per Division seems fair. | |