| Marc Legowski (CPT) | YES | This situation should be rare so seems a good solution. |
| Leon Permentier (BUS) | YES | Excellent idea! |
| Simon Bijker (BIB) | NO | When someone appeals and is right, you might have problems with the auction if you're just 50k short. |
| Colin Scott (OPT) | NO | I don't like to see anyone NMR, but I don't think imposing fines is the way forward. |
| Stephen Williams (ITP) | YES | As lomg as there is an appeal process |
| Roy Rolsten (LD) | YES | i like the logic about match revenue, but maybe only one fine per session? |
| Paul Cockayne (DB) | Stick with current rule | All these fines would restrict any new manager's cash flow should the original miscreant be sacked. Stop trying to fix something that isn't broke. |
| Richard Burnett (DUB) | Stick with current rule | |
| Sergei Gavino (ORA) | Stick with current rule | Playing passive is more than enough. I mean, is paying 50k gonna change anything? We won't avoid more NMRs that way, I think. Maybe if we charge 5? or 5$ to our real bank accounts... :) |
| James White (NJN) | Stick with current rule | |
| Derek Purvis (SXS) | Stick with current rule | |