Next Match Deadline in 39 hours and 37 minutes...
The Trade Window is currently open...
Poll Results: Should we increase the Supply of Draftees from next season?
VOTING SUMMARY
| CHOICE | TOTAL VOTES |
| NO : It's just right | 12 |
| YES : Increase to 48 Players (2 per team) | 8 |
| YES : Increase to 72 Players (3 per team) | 2 |
VOTING BREAKDOWN
| MANAGER | CHOICE | COMMENTS | |
 | Paul Cockayne (LAF) | YES : Increase to 48 Players (2 per team) | I think 2 players would be better... Perhaps one age 0 and 1 age 1 |
 | James White (KC) | NO : It's just right | |
 | Steve Turner (CLB) | YES : Increase to 48 Players (2 per team) | I just read James's blog & whilst I see his argument, I do feel that we need more youth injected into OASL & 2 DRAFT PLAYERS EACH TEAM seems a good way to do it! |
 | Willy Krosnyak (INT) | NO : It's just right | Absolutely not. |
 | David Campbell (CHA) | NO : It's just right | It's fine the way it is. |
 | Marc Legowski (DC) | YES : Increase to 48 Players (2 per team) | call me greedy.. |
 | Stephen Williams (HOU) | YES : Increase to 72 Players (3 per team) | Clubs would be forced to use up their TPs - currently some teams have an excess of TPs towards the end and apprentices cost too much and take too long to be good. |
 | Rob Lye (AUS) | NO : It's just right | |
 | Paul Roseblade (CHV) | YES : Increase to 48 Players (2 per team) | It may encourage managers to train young players if they have 2 |
 | Bryce Kalmbach (ATL) | YES : Increase to 48 Players (2 per team) | |
 | Andy Shaw (SJ) | NO : It's just right | |
 | Roy Rolsten (COL) | YES : Increase to 48 Players (2 per team) | |
 | Jason Dowson (CAR) | NO : It's just right | One draftee can have a big impact on a team and helps to level things, but two would detract from the skill in picking and training your own apps. |
 | Andrew Foss-Grant (POR) | NO : It's just right | |