Next Match Deadline in 39 hours and 37 minutes...
The Trade Window is currently open...
Poll Results: Are WGs too powerful? (Note any changes would be announced 1-2 seasons before they are enacted to allow teams to prepare)
VOTING SUMMARY
| CHOICE | TOTAL VOTES |
| No - they are not too powerful | 7 |
| Other | 2 |
| Yes - we should tweak the formulas | 2 |
| Yes - but we should keep things the same | 2 |
VOTING BREAKDOWN
| MANAGER | CHOICE | COMMENTS | |
 | Andrew Foss-Grant (POR) | Other | Happy either way. Agree they are powerful and I always keep 3 in my T-17 |
 | Rob Lye (AUS) | No - they are not too powerful | |
 | Steve Turner (CLB) | Other | See blog post. |
 | Jason Dowson (CAR) | No - they are not too powerful | Can be countered with marking |
 | Andy Shaw (SJ) | Yes - we should tweak the formulas | |
 | Willy Krosnyak (INT) | Yes - but we should keep things the same | |
 | Paul Roseblade (CHV) | Yes - we should tweak the formulas | When teams have a number of WG'ers they are too powerful using the tactic. When loads of teams have them you either follow or are left behind |
 | Derek Purvis Jnr (NSS) | No - they are not too powerful | |
 | Paul Cockayne Jnr (OCS) | No - they are not too powerful | |
 | Marc Legowski Jnr (DCC) | No - they are not too powerful | |
 | Bryce Kalmbach (ATL) | Yes - but we should keep things the same | |
 | James White (KC) | No - they are not too powerful | |
 | Stephen Williams Jnr (LHT) | No - they are not too powerful | Don't take away my thing! We got relegated playing EC last season anyway |