  | Andy Shaw (SJ) | Other suggestion - state alternative format  |  4 sections of 6, playing once each. Top two from each group to QFs.  | 
  | Jason Dowson (CAR) | 6 Sections x 4 teams playing once each - top team plus 2 best 2nd place d to Q Finals?  |    | 
  | Rob Lye (AUS) | Status Quo - 8 sections x 3 teams playing once each - top teams to Q Finals?  |    | 
  | Steve Turner (CLB) | 6 Sections x 4 teams playing once each - top team plus 2 best 2nd place d to Q Finals?  |  I like the 6x4.  Suggestion for next poll: for one of the other competitions, can we have a WC 2018 format?  Include some "youth" teams?  32 teams with 8x4 format.  Top 2 per pool make Sweet 16 bracket?  Maybe we already have that though...  | 
  | Derek Purvis Jnr (NSS) | Status Quo - 8 sections x 3 teams playing once each - top teams to Q Finals?  |  I like that it gives the cup a distinct feel from other cups in OASL/other leagues  | 
  | Mark Creasey Jnr (VCC) | 6 Sections x 4 teams playing once each - top team plus 2 best 2nd place d to Q Finals?  |  do not actually mind either format .  | 
  | Paul Roseblade (CHV) | Status Quo - 8 sections x 3 teams playing once each - top teams to Q Finals?  |    | 
  | Willy Krosnyak jnr (FTL) | 6 Sections x 4 teams playing once each - top team plus 2 best 2nd place d to Q Finals?  |  But not that unhappy with status quo either.  | 
  | Roy Rolsten Jnr (CIW) | Other suggestion - state alternative format  |  scrap it  | 
  | Bryce Kalmbach (ATL) | 6 Sections x 4 teams playing once each - top team plus 2 best 2nd place d to Q Finals?  |    | 
  | Steve Turner Jnr (REB) | Other suggestion - state alternative format  |  Doesn’t count  |