SESLSFLSLOASLODFLSOS Cup
Match Due GMT    
BlogTablesStatsCoachesJournalsLogin Features
                
                
 
 The Trade Window is currently open...
Poll Results: Proposal to change Youth Team Draft from end of Season 23
VOTING SUMMARY
CHOICETOTAL VOTES
3. Allocate 4 Age 0 players to YT. Picking order based on Parent teams finishing position(Lowest ranked teams get best), and Allocate 4 Age 1 players picking order based on Youth teams finishing position( Lowest ranked teams get best players) 5
2. Allocate 5 Age 0 players to YT. Picking order based on Parent teams finishing position(Lowest ranked teams get best), and Allocate 5 Age 1 players picking order based on Youth teams finishing position( Lowest ranked teams get best players) Increase TP 5
1. Leave draftee rules alone (No Change)5
4. Allocate 8 Age 0 players to YT Picking order based on Finishing position of Parent team ( Lowest Ranked gets best) & withdraw Age 1 players from Draft2
6. OTHER IDEAS (GIVE DETAILS)1

VOTING BREAKDOWN
MANAGERCHOICECOMMENTS
Rob Lye (AUS)3. Allocate 4 Age 0 players to YT. Picking order based on Parent teams finishing position(Lowest ranked teams get best), and Allocate 4 Age 1 players picking order based on Youth teams finishing position( Lowest ranked teams get best players)    
Andy Shaw (SJ)2. Allocate 5 Age 0 players to YT. Picking order based on Parent teams finishing position(Lowest ranked teams get best), and Allocate 5 Age 1 players picking order based on Youth teams finishing position( Lowest ranked teams get best players) Increase TP    
David Blair Jnr (DCC)1. Leave draftee rules alone (No Change)   
Steve Turner (CLB)4. Allocate 8 Age 0 players to YT Picking order based on Finishing position of Parent team ( Lowest Ranked gets best) & withdraw Age 1 players from Draft   Not averse to option 5 or 3 
Roy Rolsten (COL)2. Allocate 5 Age 0 players to YT. Picking order based on Parent teams finishing position(Lowest ranked teams get best), and Allocate 5 Age 1 players picking order based on Youth teams finishing position( Lowest ranked teams get best players) Increase TP    
Derek Purvis (SEA)2. Allocate 5 Age 0 players to YT. Picking order based on Parent teams finishing position(Lowest ranked teams get best), and Allocate 5 Age 1 players picking order based on Youth teams finishing position( Lowest ranked teams get best players) Increase TP   Increase TP is important factor in this option.  
Paul Roseblade (CHV)3. Allocate 4 Age 0 players to YT. Picking order based on Parent teams finishing position(Lowest ranked teams get best), and Allocate 4 Age 1 players picking order based on Youth teams finishing position( Lowest ranked teams get best players)    
Stephen Williams Jnr (LHT)3. Allocate 4 Age 0 players to YT. Picking order based on Parent teams finishing position(Lowest ranked teams get best), and Allocate 4 Age 1 players picking order based on Youth teams finishing position( Lowest ranked teams get best players)   Isn't this the same as what we do now?  
David Campbell (CHA)2. Allocate 5 Age 0 players to YT. Picking order based on Parent teams finishing position(Lowest ranked teams get best), and Allocate 5 Age 1 players picking order based on Youth teams finishing position( Lowest ranked teams get best players) Increase TP   Probably the best option. Will the draft change to accommodate the extra age 0s? 
Andrew Foss-Grant (POR)1. Leave draftee rules alone (No Change)  I don't feel there's anything wrong with the current system 
Willy Krosnyak (INT)1. Leave draftee rules alone (No Change)   
Bryce Kalmbach (ATL)3. Allocate 4 Age 0 players to YT. Picking order based on Parent teams finishing position(Lowest ranked teams get best), and Allocate 4 Age 1 players picking order based on Youth teams finishing position( Lowest ranked teams get best players)    
James White (KC)1. Leave draftee rules alone (No Change)   

 
White PapersDownloadsRules Wiki
Back to Top
Copyright © 1989-2013 SOS Soccer Manager, www.sos-soccer-manager.co.uk All Rights Reserved.
A custom simulator is used to run all games.
This page loaded in 0.23343 seconds.
e