  | Derek Purvis (SEA) | TWO : With 2 Up & 2 Down promotion / Relegation (2 x 12 teams)  |  But with a significant advantage for the youth teams playing in the first division as an incentive  | 
  | Willy Krosnyak (INT) |  ONE : Leave this element alone (24 teams)  |  Not at all a strong opinion though.  | 
  | Rob Lye (AUS) |  ONE : Leave this element alone (24 teams)  |    | 
  | Roy Rolsten (COL) | TWO : With 2 Up & 2 Down promotion / Relegation (2 x 12 teams)  |  As a personal preference I'd want 4 x 6 playing 4 times each. I can't see 3 working as you'd either play 14 or 28 times.   | 
  | Jason Dowson (CAR) | TWO : With 2 Up & 2 Down promotion / Relegation (2 x 12 teams)  |  Makes it more interesting for more teams  | 
  | Steve Turner (CLB) | TWO : With 2 Up & 2 Down promotion / Relegation (2 x 12 teams)  |    | 
  | Andrew Foss-Grant (POR) | Any other ideas ? :  |  Really not bothered, I don't think this will make any difference to how I run my youth team  | 
  | Marc Legowski (DC) |  ONE : Leave this element alone (24 teams)  |  No need for change just need to tweak other thing to make team put in effort to youth teams  | 
  | Mark Creasey (VAN) | Any other ideas ? :  |  Yea my idea , far better than this bunch of CRAP  | 
  | Bryce Kalmbach (ATL) | TWO : With 2 Up & 2 Down promotion / Relegation (2 x 12 teams)  |  Would be a fun addition.  | 
  | Paul Roseblade (CHV) | TWO : With 2 Up & 2 Down promotion / Relegation (2 x 12 teams)  |  A bit of change would be good.   | 
  | Andy Shaw Jnr (DAF) | TWO : With 2 Up & 2 Down promotion / Relegation (2 x 12 teams)  |    |