| Derek Purvis (SEA) | TWO : With 2 Up & 2 Down promotion / Relegation (2 x 12 teams) | But with a significant advantage for the youth teams playing in the first division as an incentive |
| Willy Krosnyak (INT) | ONE : Leave this element alone (24 teams) | Not at all a strong opinion though. |
| Rob Lye (AUS) | ONE : Leave this element alone (24 teams) | |
| Roy Rolsten (COL) | TWO : With 2 Up & 2 Down promotion / Relegation (2 x 12 teams) | As a personal preference I'd want 4 x 6 playing 4 times each. I can't see 3 working as you'd either play 14 or 28 times. |
| Jason Dowson (CAR) | TWO : With 2 Up & 2 Down promotion / Relegation (2 x 12 teams) | Makes it more interesting for more teams |
| Steve Turner (CLB) | TWO : With 2 Up & 2 Down promotion / Relegation (2 x 12 teams) | |
| Andrew Foss-Grant (POR) | Any other ideas ? : | Really not bothered, I don't think this will make any difference to how I run my youth team |
| David Blair (DC) | ONE : Leave this element alone (24 teams) | No need for change just need to tweak other thing to make team put in effort to youth teams |
| Mark Creasey (VAN) | Any other ideas ? : | Yea my idea , far better than this bunch of CRAP |
| Bryce Kalmbach (ATL) | TWO : With 2 Up & 2 Down promotion / Relegation (2 x 12 teams) | Would be a fun addition. |
| Paul Roseblade (CHV) | TWO : With 2 Up & 2 Down promotion / Relegation (2 x 12 teams) | A bit of change would be good. |
| Andy Shaw Jnr (DAF) | TWO : With 2 Up & 2 Down promotion / Relegation (2 x 12 teams) | |