The Trade Window is currently open...
Poll Results: Should OASL expand?
VOTING SUMMARY
| CHOICE | TOTAL VOTES |
| YES 32 TEAMS in 2 Divisions | 7 |
| NO | 6 |
| YES 32 TEAMS in 3 Divisions | 4 |
| YES other set up (elaborate) | 3 |
VOTING BREAKDOWN
| MANAGER | CHOICE | COMMENTS | |
 | Rob Lye (AUS) | YES 32 TEAMS in 2 Divisions | only if you can get enough coaches -thats another 8 -is it possible ??? |
 | David Blair (DC) | YES other set up (elaborate) | 36 teams in 3 divisions. |
 | Steve Turner (CLB) | YES 32 TEAMS in 2 Divisions | Time to Join the other leagues in expansion |
 | Mark Creasey (VAN) | YES 32 TEAMS in 2 Divisions | |
 | Derek Purvis (SEA) | YES 32 TEAMS in 3 Divisions | With the double group games in the cup the amount of games is just about right, but expending the league is never a bad thing imho. |
 | Tyler Ponder (LAF) | NO | Its a small compact league with plenty of interaction close family with long running managers |
 | Paul Roseblade (CHV) | YES 32 TEAMS in 2 Divisions | With a larger relegation number (say 6) plus relegation playoffs on top of that. |
 | Willy Krosnyak (INT) | NO | |
 | Stephen Williams (HOU) | NO | |
 | James White (KC) | NO | do we need to expand ? cant we just continue as the cream of the crop :-) |
 | David Campbell (CHA) | YES 32 TEAMS in 3 Divisions | If we are going to have more teams I'd prefer extra divisions as opposed to larger divisions. |
 | Bryce Kalmbach (ATL) | NO | It's fine for me as it is, in fact I may struggle to continue soon, I guess expansion really depends on the waiting list numbers is it high then? |
 | Andy Shaw (SJ) | YES 32 TEAMS in 2 Divisions | |
 | Andrew Foss-Grant (POR) | NO | I think it's fine as-is, to be honest. |