 | Leon Permentier (DEV) | Scrap it, utter nonsense | Not saying it's nonsense but you can be unlucky. |
 | Paul Cockayne (EF) | Scrap it, utter nonsense | Enough penalties are in place for teams playing a or d and random referees make the whole 200 total a farce. |
 | Dave Smyth (HEA) | Scrap it, utter nonsense | |
 | Paul Roseblade (AYR) | other (please specify) | A fine of 2k per 1 DP point over the 200 threshold seems a fairer amount. |
 | Andy Shaw (FAL) | other (please specify) | Comes up too often on the blogs for it not to be an issue. But scrapping entirely seems too much. If scrap/others win this vote, perhaps a follow up vote on 4 new fining systems? |
 | Mark Creasey (STJ) | other (please specify) | Need to get a more realistic figure that doesn't punish those who do not use a or d often. Somewhere around 250DP. |
 | Steve Turner (ALO) | Keep it, no change | |
 | Josh Fitzgerald (INV) | Scrap it, utter nonsense | I do not think there are enough options here. Would rather keep with a fine of 2k per DP starting at 200DP |
 | Roy Rolsten (STI) | other (please specify) | Raise the bar to 250 or reduce the amount of fine on a scale from 200 up |
 | Andrew McCumiskey (SRA) | other (please specify) | Small fines during the season for REDs only. |
 | Raymond Cini (PT) | total DP is money fine for all 48 teams | |
 | Lee Elkins (CB) | Keep it, no change | Bored with the continuing debate on this one. How about an additional fine for people who com pain about the fine? |
 | Rob Lye (ROS) | other (please specify) | Need something >Impose a fine + excess Dp over 200.
If not keep it. |
 | Daniel Fitzgerald (ANN) | Scrap it, utter nonsense | |
 | Ricky Hawthorn (STE) | Scrap it, utter nonsense | |
 | Mark Boland (DUU) | Keep it, no change | |
 | Matthew White (SM) | Keep it, no change | |
 | David Blair (HIB) | Keep it, no change | |
 | Stephen Williams (PET) | other (please specify) | right idea to have a cut off, but it should either be higher or the fine should be less once passing 200 DP (imo) |
 | Steve Gregory (COV) | Keep it, no change | |
 | Matt Cooper (ALB) | Scrap it, utter nonsense | Was I going to say anything else! |
 | James White (MON) | Scrap it, utter nonsense | |
 | Tyron Barnard (EST) | other (please specify) | Make the fine the amount over 150. Then a 202 DP will be only 52k fine |
 | Jason Dowson (ELG) | Scrap it, utter nonsense | Playing aggressive is already penalised enough with loss of EL and > chance of booking |
 | Tapani Olkku (GM) | other (please specify) | a modification of the rule with an incremental scale or higher threshold |
 | Cameron Archibald (ARB) | Keep it, no change | |
 | Andrew Foss-Grant (MOT) | Scrap it, utter nonsense | |
 | Derek Purvis (BER) | Scrap it, utter nonsense | |
 | Colin Scott (DUM) | Scrap it, utter nonsense | |
 | James Tucker (RR) | other (please specify) | Increase chance of penalty kicks per aggressive players and lose the fine. If impossible keep the fine. |
 | John McCarthy (LIV) | Keep it, no change | |
 | Bryce Kalmbach (QP) | other (please specify) | Some teams play more games than others, so we should create a dp per game fine or something like that if you know what i mean. Lets say if a team has 5,2 dp per game by playing 40 games and in the end more than 200 dp its still less than maybe some other |
 | Willy Krosnyak (FOR) | total DP is money fine for all 48 teams | |
 | Les Lithgo (HAM) | Keep it, no change | |
 | Marc Legowski (CLY) | Keep it, no change | |
 | Bill Ramsay (RAN) | Keep it, no change | |
 | Arnold Yzermans (QOS) | Keep it, no change | open to ideas though |
 | Simon Bijker (BRE) | Keep it, no change | |
 | Kevin Hull (AI) | Keep it, no change | |