 | Bill Nicholl (CEL) | Keep it as it is, 200DP+ fine | |
 | Steve Turner (ALO) | Change it to 250DP+ fine | Fine changed to 75% of points over 250. 150% fine over 300 DP. Some teams just get unlucky with DP. |
 | Les Lithgo (HAM) | Keep it as it is, 200DP+ fine | |
 | Arnold Yzermans (QOS) | Keep it as it is, 200DP+ fine | Keep it as is but change it to teams which average more than 4.5 DP per game played |
 | Matt Cooper (ALB) | Scrap it, silly rule, dirty play good | Surely suspensions are your punishment |
 | Cameron Archibald (ARB) | Keep it as it is, 200DP+ fine | Im happy with it how it is. |
 | Dave Smyth (HEA) | Keep it as it is, 200DP+ fine | |
 | Tyron Barnard (EST) | Keep it as it is, 200DP+ fine | Seems fair enough. Teams that play more matches earn far more gate receipts. |
 | Matthew White (SM) | Scrap it, silly rule, dirty play good | Suspensions are penalty enough |
 | Josh Fitzgerald (INV) | Scrap it, silly rule, dirty play good | DP, ban build up is enough. |
 | Paul Cockayne (EF) | Keep it as it is, 200DP+ fine | Keep the 200 DP but make the frine 4 times the extra so 230 DP would be 120k (4 x 30) and not 230k which is hefty. After all a team is already penalised for aggressive play via ELs and suspensions. |
 | David Blair (HIB) | Keep it as it is, 200DP+ fine | |
 | Mark Boland (DUU) | Scrap it, silly rule, dirty play good | you don't have to play that dirty to breach it and teams may play weakened line-ups in matches important to others to avoid it |
 | Colin Scott (DUM) | Scrap it, silly rule, dirty play good | Dirty play good - is not very sporting. Why don't we come up with something better. 1k for every 2DP. For every team. That's fair at least. |
 | Tapani Olkku (GM) | Scrap it, silly rule, dirty play good | Starting next season we just ditch a/d all together, play 442 all passive. ok sarcy! I like carrots, don't like sticks, it's just a game. Reward 'fair' play more as James Tucker said 120 years ago! |
 | Kevin Hull (AI) | Keep it as it is, 200DP+ fine | If same teams hit by this rule then suggests it is still NOT a big enough deterrent. |
 | Bill Ramsay (RAN) | Keep it as it is, 200DP+ fine | |
 | Raymond Cini (PT) | Keep it as it is, 200DP+ fine | Same teams, minority, each season are complaining about it, the others not. |
 | Daniel Fitzgerald (ANN) | Scrap it, silly rule, dirty play good | I do think playin a/d can be to easy and agree. It does go unpunished (EL aside) more often than not so why not inc. the RC risk. No fine though as ultimately it is a legit tactic after all! |
 | Lee Elkins (CB) | Keep it as it is, 200DP+ fine | If we remove it I suggest upping the EL used by d/a players to 8 or increasing booking chances? |
 | David Campbell (KIL) | Scrap it, silly rule, dirty play good | |
 | Daniel Roseblade (DFA) | Scrap it, silly rule, dirty play good | |
 | Andrew McCumiskey (SRA) | Keep it as it is, 200DP+ fine | |
 | Roy Rolsten (STI) | Keep it as it is, 200DP+ fine | maybe change the fines a little, like:
200DP = 200k,
249DP still is 200k, but
250DP = 350k,
300DP = 500k.
|
 | Andrew Foss-Grant (MOT) | Scrap it, silly rule, dirty play good | Its a silly rule as the punishment for red cards is already in the system. |
 | Mark Creasey (STJ) | Scrap it, silly rule, dirty play good | |
 | Ricky Hawthorn (STE) | Scrap it, silly rule, dirty play good | |
 | James Tucker (RR) | Keep it as it is, 200DP+ fine | Or increase the chance of PKs occurring in a match? |
 | Marc Legowski (CLY) | Keep it as it is, 200DP+ fine | |
 | Willy Krosnyak (FOR) | Scrap it, silly rule, dirty play good | |
 | Stephen Williams (PET) | Scrap it, silly rule, dirty play good | |
 | Rob Lye (ROS) | Change it to 250DP+ fine | |
 | Alon Atie (FRA) | Keep it as it is, 200DP+ fine | |
 | Andy Shaw (FAL) | Keep it as it is, 200DP+ fine | DFA get fined every season so maybe not enough of a deterrant |
 | Paul Roseblade (AYR) | Keep it as it is, 200DP+ fine | |
 | Alan Bishop (COW) | Keep it as it is, 200DP+ fine | |